January 28, 2021

Strategy Sustainable cost Reduction

Barriers to Strategy Sustainable cost Reduction

• One Size Fits All – Not all costs are equal; organizations indiscriminately tackle “good” costs that support business growth and “bad” costs that don’t directly contribute to business value

• Delivered in Organizational Silos – Targets are set and budget holders left to deliver, without considering the duplication and waste that sit across the organization’s silos

• No Clear Roadmap – Initiatives are fragmented and often overlapping; limited consideration for limited organizational resources or capacity for change

• Lack of Controls – All the effort is put into identifying and executing cost reduction initiatives, but benefits are not realized or costs creep back in over time

• Misaligned Incentives – The reward for success is a smaller budget and new stretch targets. Money taken out is not reinvested and the best performers get another top-down target the following year

• Chasing the Dead Duck – Not knowing when to quit and change direction; all initiatives will not be successful

• Top Quartile Fallacy –Finally feeling you’ve reached the end because you’ve delivered your target; the world is changing fast and what was good yesterday may not be good tomorrow

Success to Strategy Sustainable Cost Reduction

l Build a common baseline

Map and understand your spending and cost structure, identify cost driver, and align the direction

l Align on “good and “bad” cost

Good cost=value added, bad cost=don’t directly contribute business value.

Then overlay different “cost lenses” to identify the key cost areas and target them for efficiency or effectiveness improvement.

² Organizational structure

² Function and cost category benchmarking to compare with your competitors or similar

² Digital

² Identify the right levers in the right sequence

Armed with a high-level understanding of the “bad” cost areas, establish cross-functional teams to deep dive into priority opportunity areas, evaluate potential cost take-out levers, and validate the size of prize.

The right lever will depend on the cost driver, for example:

Demand Management: Can I reduce demand for activity by challenging the need and reducing customization — for instance, through zero-based budgeting?

Process Improvement: Can I drive greater efficiencies and value from standardization and optimization of effort and activity?

Automation: Can I industrialize or digitize certain processes to save time/cost?

l Centralization: Can non-automated processes be reconfigured to obtain efficiency improvements?

l Strategic Sourcing: Can I transfer some operations to onshore or offshore outsourcers to improve efficiency and flexibility?

l Assign senior leadership accountability

To ensure the longevity of your cost reduction initiative, embed cost ownership and accountability at the leadership and functional levels to baseline budgets and ensure buy-in to targets. Assign cost owners at each management level with senior management taking accountability for delivery.

l Extract “bad” cost with Rigor and Discipline

Accountability and direction are important, but you also need to arm cost owners with tools to examine, challenge, and take action.

Share This Novas QC's Article, Choose Your Platform!

Leave A Comment